Facebook PixelJuly 2019 Telephone Town Hall FAQs | Colorado PERA
headerimg

    July 2019 Telephone Town Hall FAQs

    Inside Colorado PERA

    Blog Image

    July 10, 2019

    On Tuesday, July 9, Colorado PERA conducted telephone town halls for members and retirees. These town halls gave members and retirees a chance to ask questions and talk to PERA leadership about the investment performance in 2018, PERA’s funded status, and the impact of recent legislation. If you missed the calls, recordings are posted here.

    A summary of the most asked questions and responses is below. Questions about individual retirement benefits may be answered by contacting PERA Customer Service at 1-800-759-7372.

    What was PERA’s investment return in 2018? My investments did better in 2018.

    For the year ending December 31, 2018, PERA’s investment portfolio returned a negative 3.5 percent. While last year’s return was disappointing, PERA is a long-term investor and the investment program is designed to perform over the long term. PERA’s investment program has returned 8.8 percent over 10 years. 

    For most investors, 2018 was a difficult year. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI ACWI, declined 9.4 percent in 2018, while the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index was flat for the year. When comparing investment performance, it’s important to keep the time period in mind. Different time frames will lead to differences in investment performance because the market can fluctuate from one period to the next.


    What is PERA’s funded status after 2018? Why did the funded status decline?

    The funded status for the PERA defined benefit trusts at the end of 2018 was 59.8 percent, compared to 61.3 percent at the end of 2017.The investment return is just one piece of what goes into the plan’s funded status. We also make assumptions about factors such as salaries, head count growth, the number of retirements, among others. Last year, many of our demographic assumptions didn’t play out favorably. For instance, payroll growth was stronger than we expected, and the School Division, PERA’s largest, had more early retirements. These factors also impact the funded status.

    How is last year’s legislation working?

    In 2018, the Colorado General Assembly passed Senate Bill 200 which included provisions to help PERA adapt to changes in demographics or the market. The legislation is designed to help ensure the fund’s stability over time and put PERA on a path to full funding by 2047. The bill made changes to the plan that included increases in contributions and modifications to benefits.

    On July 1, active members, except those who work in the Local Government Division, saw an increase in contributions, and most members are now contributing 8.75 percent of their pay toward their PERA benefit. PERA retirees are experiencing the second year of the suspension of the annual increase (AI).

    The legislation also included a provision, called the automatic adjustment that is triggered when PERA falls ahead of or behind schedule to reach full funding. These changes are not easy on PERA members or retirees. They are, however, designed to make sure PERA stays on the path that ensures retirement security today and tomorrow.

    When will retirees get an annual increase?

    Legislation in 2018 (SB 200) suspended the annual increase for 2018 and 2019. The legislation also contained “guard rails” (called the automatic adjustment) to keep PERA on the path to full funding by 2047. The negative investment year in 2018 and other demographic shifts affected PERA’s funded status, and the automatic adjustment will go into effect in July 2020. This means that when the annual increase is restored in July 2020, it will be 1.25 percent.

    How does the automatic adjustment work, and how long will it take for the AI to go back up and contributions to go down?

    Last year’s investment losses coupled with demographic shifts mean that PERA has fallen behind on its funding goal, which has triggered the automatic adjustment. That means that the three rates: member contributions, employer contributions, and the AI paid to retirees, will all change beginning July 1, 2020.In July 2020, the AI paid to retirees will be set at a maximum of 1.25 percent.

    SB 200 contained scheduled increases for members (except for members in the Local Government Division) of 0.75 percent in July 2019, 0.75 percent in July 2020, and 0.5 percent in 2021. Due to the automatic adjustment, member contributions will increase by an additional 0.5 percent, on top of the scheduled increases, in July 2020. That means in 2020, most members will contribute a total of 10 percent to PERA from each paycheck.

    The amount all employers contribute to PERA will also increase by one half of one percent in July 2020. Total employer contributions will range from 14.2 percent to 23.6 percent, depending on the Division.

    While it’s challenging to predict exactly when the AI will go up and member and employer contribution rates will go down, it may take a decade for these changes to go back to current levels.

    Are PERA employees participating in cuts like we are?

    The 300 PERA employees are also PERA members and they began contributing more on July 1. They will also have to wait three years before becoming eligible for a reduced AI in retirement.

    Can investment fees be reduced to fund the annual increase?

    PERA takes seriously our responsibility to be good stewards of the resources we manage on behalf of our members. The cost to invest $48 billion is competitive and low – 37 basis points, or 0.37 percent of assets. Administrative costs are also low when PERA is compared to our public pension peers across the country.

    About 60 percent of PERA’s assets are invested internally, by PERA employees. By managing these investments in-house, PERA saves about $45 million a year.

    Does PERA invest with a focus on environmental sustainability?

    While PERA recognizes the important role of all financially material factors, including those that may pertain to sustainability, PERA does not make investment decisions to suit personal beliefs of any person or group.

    An investment strategy based on personal value systems may be impossible to implement in a way that reflects all our members’ individual beliefs. As a fiduciary, our highest priority must remain the stability of the fund for all our members.

    The PERA Board has adopted a Statement that outlines PERA’s policy on divestment. PERA does not have the authority to determine social, environmental, or economic policy, and exists to invest for one purpose – to ensure the retirement security of Colorado’s current and retired public employees.

    Is PERA still a valuable benefit?

    Yes, absolutely. The PERA defined benefit plan is well-designed to meet the goal of giving members the best replacement income in retirement. In other words, PERA does a better job of replacing a member’s working income than any other retirement plan on the market – including Social Security and 401(k) style plans. When PERA defined benefit members retire, they continue to get a steady PERA paycheck for the rest of their lives—even if, like some of our members, they live into their hundreds. This is why PERA is a benefit you can’t outlive. With a 401(k), once that account is depleted, the benefit is done.

    Also, it’s important to remember that PERA members have benefits even when the unexpected happens. For example, PERA members get survivor and disability benefits. And they have access to a low-cost, world-class 401(k) and/or 457 plan. What’s more is that PERA benefits are portable. You can move from one PERA employer to another and your retirement plan will stay the same, meaning you have flexibility in where you work throughout your career while continuing to grow your retirement benefit.

    What is PERA doing to eliminate the WEP?

    PERA staff is meeting with members of the Colorado Congressional delegation to educate and heighten awareness of how this federal law impacts PERA members who may work for a PERA employer and also work for an employer that participates in Social Security. There have been efforts recently to change the calculation or eliminate the Windfall Elimination Provision. Currently, U.S. Congressional Representatives Crow, Tipton, and Perlmutter have signed on as co-sponsors of H.R. 141. You can find more information on the status of WEP and federal legislation here. We encourage members to contact their congressional representative to let them know how the WEP impacts them.

    Is PERA going to increase the PERACare subsidy for retirees under 65 who aren’t yet eligible for Medicare?

    We know the cost of pre-Medicare health care coverage has increased significantly. We’ve been able to offer lower cost plans to our retirees who have Medicare, but the pre-Medicare coverage market remains a challenge for us, and this is true for most Americans. We have been encouraged by efforts at the state level to explore ways to reduce health care costs for Coloradans. But, increasing the subsidy for pre-Medicare PERACare enrollees would negatively impact the financial status of the health care trusts and also require legislation, and we don’t anticipate the Board seeking or supporting legislation that would negatively impact the financial health of the trusts.

    Related Posts

    Subscribe to PERA On The Issues

    Stay informed by subscribing to our newsletter. Youʹll receive one email every two weeks that contains a summary of all the latest news.

    Hero area image