|
PERA
News Archives (former
Latest News items for 2004)
December 21, 2004
Colorado PERA, with
assets now in excess of $31 billion, is the nation’s 25th
largest public pension fund. PERA, like other pension funds, has
seen its funded status fall over the past three years due to an
unprecedented decline in the financial markets. PERA’s funded
status was also impacted by statutory changes in the benefit
structure that encouraged members to retire earlier and at
younger ages.
The PERA Board of
Trustees has taken a number of steps to address the funding
issues. The Board’s investment and asset allocation policies
have been enhanced to lower the volatility of future investment
returns, and significant limitations and cost increases have
been imposed on those members purchasing service credit. Most
recently, PERA joined with the Governor in sponsoring a
comprehensive package of forward-looking changes to the plan
that will significantly limit future liabilities and enhance
revenues. The legislation passed in 2004 will have a very
positive impact on PERA’s future funded status. PERA believes it
is important to proceed with the implementation of the 2004
legislation, to carefully monitor and assess the impact of these
changes, and, as future performance results may require,
recommend necessary additional changes.
PERA continues to
enjoy positive cash flow, paying out almost $2 billion in
retirement benefits to over 67,000 retired Colorado public
servants in the current year, while continuing to add to the
value of its investment portfolio. PERA is currently positioned
to pay anticipated benefits for decades to come.
PERA has a
longstanding commitment to the timely, accurate, and honest
disclosure of its operational, financial, and investment
performance. Efforts will continue to communicate the facts
about PERA’s funded status to PERA’s more than 350,000 members
and benefit recipients, in addition to taxpayers and others with
an interest in PERA. PERA welcomes opportunities to work with
individuals and organizations interested in better understanding
PERA issues.
Get
PERA Information From PERA
Colorado PERA reminds members that the best source for
information related to your PERA account is from PERA. While
other vendors may claim to know about PERA, your best course of
action is to call PERA’s Customer Service Center at
1-800-759-7372 or 303-832-9550.
Colorado PERA does not have any affiliation with, nor does it
endorse, any financial planning services or other insurance
agencies. This means if a financial planner or insurance agent
wants to counsel you on your retirement benefits or says that
they are hosting a meeting in conjunction with PERA—he or she is
not representing PERA.
Recently, some PERA members have received e-mail solicitations
stating that PERA's “pension benefit formula has substantially
changed recently.” The e-mail encourages PERA members to send
personal financial information by replying to the e-mail. This
e-mail is an attempt to either gain access to personal
information for identification theft or an attempt to sell
members a financial service or product.
PERA does not contact members in this manner and would never ask
for information that we already have secured in our member
information files. Remember that you can always contact PERA for
information on your account by e-mailing us through our Web site
or by calling our Customer Service Center at 1-800-759-7372.
We encourage members to attend one of the official meetings
sponsored by Colorado PERA that are held around the state to
learn more about your PERA retirement plan. PERA staff can give
you information specific to your individual situation. We are
the experts on your future benefits, and we charge no fees or
commissions.
Colorado PERA Names David Williamson to Vacant Board Seat
At its September meeting, the Colorado
PERA Board of Trustees voted to appoint David Williamson, the
chief information officer for Boulder Valley School District, to
the vacant Board seat in the School Category.
Williamson has worked for the Boulder
Valley School District since 2001. Prior to that he was a
technical services manager at the Poudre School District from
1993 to 2001. He served as an adjunct professor at Colorado
State University from 1996 to 2000 and has worked as a
consultant for several Colorado and Wyoming school districts,
city governments, and banking institutions.
In 1982, Williamson earned his bachelor’s
degree in mathematics, with a concentration in computer science,
from Colorado State University. He earned his master’s degree in
computer information systems from Colorado State University in
1994.
“I’m excited about the opportunity to
serve on the PERA Board of Trustees. It’s an honor to work with
the other board members and PERA’s excellent staff as we keep
PERA one of the top public retirement systems in the nation. I
look forward to the challenges and successes this year brings to
PERA and the board,” said Williamson.
Williamson replaces Sandi Mills who
resigned from the Board in September. Williamson received the
next highest number of votes behind Mills in the latest
election. His term will end June 30, 2005.
Colorado PERA's
Position on Socially Responsible Investing
We often receive calls, letters, and
e-mail from our members and benefit recipients requesting that
PERA not invest in a particular company because that company may
not be a good corporate citizen. Members and benefit recipients
ask that PERA use the power of its large portfolio to impact
social change. In the past, the PERA Board of Trustees has been
asked to direct investments away from companies that produce
tobacco products, companies that conduct business in South
Africa, or those that might be buying goods from countries that
have questionable labor practices.
Investing in socially responsible
companies is an issue that the PERA Board of Trustees examines
periodically, but has chosen not to pursue at this time. Here’s
why: The Board of Trustees directs PERA staff to consider
investment risk and to optimize return when investing the PERA
trust funds. Other considerations such as statutory limits and
portfolio diversification are also used when the PERA Board and
investment staff determine what investments will be made.
Additional parameters for investing at PERA include the fact
that a majority of the equity portfolio is passively managed. In
a passive strategy, investment professionals are not actively
selecting what stocks to buy or sell. A portfolio's contents
closely mirror an index such as the Wilshire 5000 in a passive
strategy.
The definition of what is socially
responsible is often open to interpretation. What is socially
responsible to one person may not be perceived as such to
another person. Further, restricting the investment universe
through social investment policies could have a negative impact
on the investment returns for PERA. The Board of Trustees and
investment staff have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that
the PERA trust funds are invested for the benefit of all PERA
members and benefit recipients.
Members and benefit recipients always have
the option to avoid buying those products made by companies they
feel use questionable business practices and to direct their
voluntary investments to stocks of companies that meet their
personal investment standards.
For more information on what Colorado PERA
is doing related to investments, please see the article on
corporate governance “Working for You” on page 3 of the September 2004
Member Report.
Colorado PERA: Cost Effective and Valuable Recruitment Tool
In the State of Colorado’s Fiscal Year
2005-2006 Annual Compensation Survey Report (available online at
www.colorado.gov/dpa/dhr/comp/docs/survey.pdf), Colorado PERA
benefits were rated as the most effective element of the State’s
benefit package.
The State’s Division of Human Resources (DHR)
conducted the electronic survey of State managers, supervisors,
and human resources administrators. The 537 respondents
evaluated the effectiveness of the state’s total compensation
package on recruiting and retaining qualified workers.
PERA provides these valued retirement
benefits to public employees at a cost lower than many of its
peers. Current PERA-affiliated employer contribution rates are
below the regional average for both public and private sector
retirement plans according to rates surveyed by PERA and the
United States Chamber of Commerce (see charts below).
Colorado PERA’s state and school employers currently contribute
10.15 percent of their employees’ salary. The employer
contribution rate was as low as 9.9 percent in 2001, down from
11.4 percent in 2000. These reduced employer contribution rates
have saved Colorado’s public employers and taxpayers more than $250
million over the past four years.
PERA members contribute a fixed rate of 8
percent of salary (state troopers contribute 10 percent of
salary).
|
Colorado PERA Employer Contribution Rates Compare
Favorably to Other Regional Pension Plans |
|
Other Colorado
Public Pension Plans |
2004 |
|
Arapahoe County |
12.2% |
|
City
of Fort Collins |
13.7% |
|
University of Colorado Faculty |
16.2% |
|
Jefferson County* |
12.2% |
|
City
of Grand Junction |
12.2% |
|
Larimer County |
10.7% |
|
Denver City & County |
14.2% |
|
City
of Broomfield |
12.2% |
|
City
of Lakewood |
11.8% |
|
City
of Westminster |
10.3% |
|
Average Employer Contribution for 10 Colorado
Retirement Systems |
12.6% |
|
|
Public DB Pension
Plans in Other States 2004 |
2004 |
|
California State Teachers Retirement System |
10.3% |
|
Maryland Retirement
System |
14.3% |
|
South Carolina Retirement System |
13.8% |
|
Ohio
State Teachers Retirement System |
13.0% |
|
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System |
13.4% |
|
Pennsylvania School Retirement System |
9.2% |
|
Florida Retirement System |
12.5% |
|
Ohio
Public Employees Retirement System |
9.3% |
|
Georgia Teachers Retirement System |
15.4% |
|
California Public Employees Retirement System |
18.8% |
|
Average Employer Contribution for 10 Public DB
Plans |
13.0% |
|
Average Employer Contribution for 33 Public DB
Plans |
10.9% |
|
Colorado PERA |
10.15% |
|
|
Neighboring States’
Public Pension Plans |
2004 |
|
New
Mexico State Retirement System |
22.8% |
|
New
Mexico School Retirement System |
14.9% |
|
Utah
Retirement System |
19.4% |
|
Wyoming Retirement System |
17.5% |
|
Kansas Retirement System |
10.8% |
|
Nebraska Retirement System |
13.5% |
|
Oklahoma Retirement System |
16.2% |
|
Average Employer Contribution for 7 Regional
Retirement Systems |
16.4% |
|
|
Private Employers |
2004 |
|
Average Costs for All Private Employers |
11.75% |
|
From 2003 Chamber of
Commerce Report, January 2004 |
|
|
Social
Security OASDI Contributions are included when
applicable. |
|
* Jefferson
County contributions exclude 2% match on employees’
voluntary 457 plan contributions in 2004 |
The statutes that govern Colorado PERA
allow the amount the employer pays toward accrued benefit
liabilities to float based on the funded status of the pension
plan as projected by actuaries. As a result of investment losses
suffered in 2000, 2001, and 2002, PERA’s actuaries recommended
increasing employer contribution rates. A phased-in approach to
increasing employer contributions will begin with an increase of
0.5 percent of salary in January 2006, to reach a total of a 3
percent increase by 2012. The new contribution rates will be
comparable with other similar pension plans and still below the
rates of neighboring states.
The higher employer contribution rate is
one of several changes made by the Legislature this year at
PERA’s request. The PERA Board of Trustees and staff continue to
monitor the funded status of the system, and will request
legislative changes as necessary over time.
PERA, the state’s largest retirement
system, has a membership of over 350,000 Colorado public
employees. In 2003, 64,000 retirees were paid $1.6 billion in
benefits. Nearly 90 percent of PERA’s benefit recipients call
Colorado home, so these benefit payments represent a substantial
positive impact on the state’s economy.
PERA is a defined benefit plan that
requires member and employer contributions that are invested and
paid to members at retirement for their lifetime. The majority
of PERA members do not contribute to Social Security, so for
many, PERA is the only retirement benefit they will receive. The
average PERA member retires with 22 years of service and is 58
years old. The average monthly benefit in 2003 was $2,143, for
an annual benefit of $25,716.
Colorado PERA Terminates Relationship with External Manager and Hires External
Manager
Colorado PERA has terminated an external
money manager. Bank of Ireland Asset Management (BIAM) was
notified last week that they would no longer be managing an
international equity account with assets of $495 million, or
about 10 percent of PERA’s total international equity portfolio.
This decision was related to concerns regarding investment
performance and the recent departure of several members of the
BIAM investment team. The assets from this termination are
currently being managed by Barclays Global Investors.
Colorado PERA hired Barclays Global
Investors to manage a passive fixed income portfolio benchmarked
to the Lehman Aggregate Index. $200 million in cash was used to
initially fund this passive portfolio.
Colorado PERA’s investment professionals
manage nearly two-thirds of PERA’s $29 billion portfolio
internally, and periodically review the performance of external
managers. Ennis Knupp, the Board’s Investment Consultant,
provided advice on the changes.
Board
Action Regarding Service Purchase Costs
The Board of Trustees voted at its
September 17, 2004, meeting to increase the rate for service
credit purchases. For all purchases of non-covered employment on
or after November 1, 2005, the cost will be the full actuarial
cost on an attained age basis, but not less than the sum of the
member and employer contributions in effect at the time of the
purchase. Members may use the Purchase Service Credit
cost calculator to determine their actuarial rate.
|
Current
Purchasing Service Credit Rates Through October 31, 2005 |
|
Age Group |
State/School & Municipal
Division |
Troopers |
Judges |
|
|
Under
age 50 |
18.1% of
HAS |
22.85% of
HAS |
21.75% of
HAS |
|
Age 50 and older |
22.1% of HAS |
26.85% of HAS |
25.75% of HAS |
|
Actuarial rates are based on the cost of
the benefit which results from the service credit purchased.
All required documentation must be received at PERA by 4:30 p.m.
on October 31, 2005. A postmark of October 31 is not sufficient.
PERA's
Funded Status
Why is Colorado PERA in the news so
much lately?
Pension funds have been in the media
spotlight the past several months, and Colorado PERA’s defined
benefit plan that covers over 350,000 of Colorado’s public
employees has not been excluded from this coverage. Pension
funds invest in the financial markets and have been seriously
impacted, as all investors have, after three of the worst
performance years in market history.
The primary measure of a pension fund’s
health is its funded status that compares what assets are
available to what benefits must be paid. It must be remembered
that all benefits are not due and payable immediately. (Even if
they were, PERA could pay benefits for many years, without
changes in contributions or reductions in benefits.)
Public pension plans are long-term
investors and have many decades to invest before all benefits
become payable. It is prudent to make incremental adjustments to
the many factors actuaries use to determine a plan’s funded
status, and not rush to propose simple, short-sighted solutions
to complex issues.
How does PERA’s current funded status
compare to past funded levels?
At the end of 2003, PERA’s funded level
(assets compared to benefits due now and in the future) was 76
percent. PERA’s funded level was below 60 percent in 1970, and
there was not a perceived crisis in PERA’s financial health.
When PERA’s funded status topped 100 percent, the current State
administration promoted a plan that was adopted to make sure
taxpayers, through employer contribution reductions, shared in
PERA’s success with consistently favorable investment markets.
Colorado taxpayers saved $250 million in employer contribution
rate reductions alone since 2000.

How will investment performance in 2004
and the future impact PERA?
PERA uses a “smoothing” method that evens
out the highs and lows of investment returns over a four-year
period. This is done so that a better long-term picture (since
pension plans are long-term investors) can be seen. Pointing to
a six-month return as an example to base policy decisions on is
unsound and irresponsible given the nature of pension funding.
What steps has PERA’s Board of Trustees
taken to improve the funded status?
The PERA Board sought legislation in 2003
to discontinue MatchMaker and increase the employer contribution
rate. This legislation, although passed by a majority of the
Legislature, was vetoed by the Governor. Also in 2003, the Board
increased the cost at which members could purchase service
credit. This year, the Board secured legislation to increase the
employer contribution rate, increase the age at which new
members (hired on or after July 1, 2005) will be allowed to
retire with an unreduced benefit, reduce the annual increase in
retirement benefits for this same group, lower the interest paid
to all member contribution accounts, and end MatchMaker until
PERA is better funded.
What’s the bottom line?
PERA will continue to pay benefits to
current and future retirees. Changes to pension policy take many
years to be fully realized. What matters is that appropriate
steps have been taken to begin addressing the funded status of
PERA. The Board and PERA staff will continue to monitor and
report on the funded status and, as appropriate, recommend
additional action.
Life
Insurance Enhancements in 2005; No Fall Open Enrollment
PERA’s Board of Trustees has selected a
new vendor for PERA’s life insurance program, UnumProvident, and
has approved consolidation of the benefits currently being
offered through Anthem Life and Prudential into one program with
UnumProvident. PERA staff is working with UnumProvident on
program development and transition planning. The transition is
being targeted for April 2005.
In preparation for the upcoming changes,
PERA will not be conducting life insurance open enrollment this
fall. Instead, life insurance open enrollment will move to a
spring timeframe in 2005 and future years.
If you are enrolled in PERA’s life
insurance program with either Anthem or Prudential, you will be
automatically transitioned to the program with UnumProvident. If
you are an active member who is not enrolled in either of these
plans, you will have the opportunity to enroll with
UnumProvident during next spring’s open enrollment period.
Detailed information about the new plan will be available on
PERA’s Web site and will be sent to all PERA members during the
first quarter of 2005.
Between now and the next open enrollment
period, the current PERA-sponsored life insurance through Anthem
Life and Prudential insurance companies will still be available
to members. Members can apply for insurance at any time and do
not need to wait for open enrollment.
You may view the current
Anthem Life
and
Prudential brochures and print the enrollment form for each
of the plans.
Colorado PERA's 401(k) Plan and the Dodge
& Cox Balanced Fund
Dodge & Cox recently announced that it
would close its Balanced Fund to new investors beginning
September 10, 2004. This will not affect PERA's 401(k) Plan. The
Dodge & Cox Balanced Fund will remain open to all current and
future PERA 401(k) Plan participants.
Colorado PERA Hires New Director of Investment Operations
|

Thomas Liddy |
Colorado
PERA recently named Thomas Liddy as its director of
Investment Operations. Liddy began his new
responsibilities on August 11.
As director of Investment
Operations, Liddy will monitor and oversee investment
contracts, trade settlements, and cash flow to ensure
compliance with legal guidelines, investment policies,
strategies, practices, and procedures.
Liddy most recently
worked for Janus Capital Group from April 2000 to April
2004 as the supervisor in fund accounting operations.
Prior to that he worked at OppenheimerFunds as a manager
in mutual fund accounting operations.
Liddy received his
bachelor’s degree in business administration with
emphases in finance and accounting and a minor in
economics from the University of Colorado at Denver. He
holds Series 6 and Series 7 securities licenses.
“I am very excited to
join a group as talented as the one at Colorado PERA,”
said Liddy. “My focus will be on continuing PERA’s
commitment to provide high standards of service and
endorsing the principles of integrity within our
operations.”
Liddy replaced Daryl
Roberts who retired at the end of August.
News Release (PDF) |
PERA's Investments and
Terrorism
Colorado PERA does not knowingly or
intentionally make investments in companies that support
terrorism or that are considered by the government of the United
States of America to be national security risks. Only the
federal government can identify such companies. PERA's
investment processes are designed to identify and manage
investment risks. PERA's fiduciary responsibility strictly
limits PERA's investment decisions and mandates that investments
be made in the sole interest of the members and beneficiaries of
the retirement plan and for the exclusive purpose of providing
retirement benefits to them.
Colorado PERA is a member of several
organizations that are active in policy issues that impact
public pension funds. As a member of the National Association of
State Retirement Administrators (NASRA), PERA, along with other
public pension plans, has sought the help of the federal
government in identifying companies that conduct business in
countries that support terrorism. In recent letters to Secretary
Tom Ridge, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Chairman
William H. Donaldson, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
NASRA member funds have sought the federal government's guidance
in identifying companies that support terrorism or that
constitute national security risks. While DHS has not replied to
the request for assistance, the SEC has responded indicating
that "It would be inappropriate for [the SEC] to publish a list
of companies whose securities might be deemed to involve
terrorism-related investment risk without publishing
corresponding lists for every other possible type of investment
risk."
The Center for Security Policy's recent
publication "Terrorism Investments of the 50 States," is of
questionable objectivity. The report’s analysis was conducted by
Conflict Securities Advisory Group (CSAG), a private company
that sells software and services aimed at identifying companies
that pose national security risks. PERA and NASRA question the
objectivity of research conducted by the company most likely to
benefit from a negative report. Of concern is the Center’s
report and relationship with CSAG because they appear to be an
effort to take advantage of our nation's fear of terrorism.
PERA, through NASRA and its member public
pension systems, continues to seek the assistance of the federal
government in identifying companies that pose national security
risks. PERA is hopeful that these agencies of the federal
government will make the national security decisions that public
employee pension plans cannot.
Colorado PERA "Shareholder" Meetings
Scheduled
As a Colorado PERA
member—or “shareholder”—are you puzzled by what is in the news
about PERA? Want to learn more about the 2004 legislation and
what it means to PERA’s financial condition?
Attend one of the 18
PERA Shareholder Meetings being held around the state to give
you the opportunity to understand the issues facing PERA. Also,
PERA is inviting candidates for the Colorado House and Senate
legislative districts to the meetings to hear firsthand about
PERA and to meet PERA members and retirees.
The meetings will
involve a social/registration period starting at 6:30 p.m. so
you can meet your local legislative candidates. A briefing about
PERA will begin at 7:00 p.m. and will conclude with a question
and answer period. The meetings are scheduled to end at 8:00
p.m.
PERA members and
retirees are encouraged to attend
(meetings schedule).
Please check
www.copera.org for any last
minute changes/information about the meetings.
Information About Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and PERACare
In
May, Governor Owens signed Senate Bill 04-94, which
conforms state law to the new federal law enacted last
December that allows individuals under age 65 to
contribute to an HSA if they are covered under a health
plan with a high deductible. Under federal law, the
minimum annual deductible for individual coverage under
eligible plans is $1,000 and for family coverage,
$2,000. Based upon current federal guidance, PERA has
redesigned its PPO#2 plans in the PERACare Health
Benefits Program to be “High Deductible Health Plans”
for 2005. These PPO#2 plans will be available from PERA/Mutual of Omaha and Rocky Mountain Health Plans. If you
are enrolled in one of these plans, you will be eligible
to contribute to an HSA in 2005.
PERA has
no authority to offer HSAs. Banks and other financial
institutions that are qualified to offer IRAs are qualified to
offer HSAs, so you may want to check with your local bank or
credit union. Because this is a new type of plan and a complex
one, most financial institutions have been slow to get into this
business. They were awaiting the issuance of federal
regulations to ensure that they were designing their plans to
be in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. It is
likely that these plans may start to become more available in
late 2004 and early 2005.
Both
Mutual of Omaha and Rocky Mountain Health Plans expect to have
cooperative arrangements in place with HSA vendors for 2005.
PERACare enrollees will be able to use those vendors if they
choose.
Note that,
because HSAs are individual, portable accounts much like IRAs,
it is expected that there will be fees associated with HSA
accounts. Preliminary estimates show annual fees in the range of
$36-$60. If you are considering using an HSA arrangement, you
will want to compare services, options, and fees, since they are
likely to vary widely.
Colorado PERA Board Election Results Announced
Colorado PERA members elected incumbents
Amy Nichols and Sandi Mills to the two School Category seats,
and Tammy Long to the State Category seat of the 16-member Board
of Trustees.
Nichols is a math teacher in the Aurora
Public Schools. She has served on the Colorado PERA Board of
Trustees since 2000.
“As a Trustee it has been a privilege to
work on behalf of all PERA members and I look forward to
continuing the work of the Board as we meet future challenges
and needs of the pension plan,” said Nichols. “PERA seeks to be
the plan of choice for all public employees. Through education
and prudent decision making it is my goal to bring this vision
to fruition.“
Mills is a fourth grade teacher in the
Fort Morgan School District. She has served on the Board since
2003 when she was appointed to fill a vacant seat.
“It is truly an honor and privilege to
continue as a PERA Board Trustee. Being a Trustee is an
excellent opportunity to represent the views of educators while
keeping PERA a sound, fiduciary entity,” said Mills.
Long is a Business Officer for the
Colorado State Patrol in Grand Junction and is the current
president of the Colorado State Patrol Family Foundation.
“It is truly a privilege to have been
elected to the Board of Trustees. I am eager to take on the
responsibility of doing all I possibly can do as a Board member
to make PERA the plan of choice in Colorado public employment. I
look forward to the challenges ahead as we continue to work
toward PERA’s mission while dealing with the issues of the day
and keeping members involved and informed,” said Long.
Nichols received 7,297 or 31.25 percent of
the votes in the School Category. Mills had 5,204 or 22.29
percent of the votes. Nichols will serve a four-year term and
Mills will serve for two years, finishing the term of a Trustee
who left the Board. Long received 2,265 or 37.27 percent of
votes in the State Category.
By state law, the management of the public
employees’ retirement fund is vested in the Board of Trustees.
The Board is composed of 16 Trustees, including the State
Auditor and the State Treasurer as voting ex-officio members of
the Board. Fourteen Trustees are elected by mail ballot by their
respective Division/Category members and serve on the Board for
four-year terms. Five members are elected from the School
Category and four from the State Category in the State and
School Division, two from the Municipal Division, and one from
the Judicial Division. Two members are elected by retirees.
Response to July 5, 2004,
Rocky Mountain News Editorial
The editorial states that the decision to
terminate the merger between Colorado PERA and Denver Public
Schools Retirement System (DPSRS) was made in the best interests
of Colorado PERA members and that is a true statement. Details
about the terms of the merger are not public, however, and
cannot be disclosed. Discussions between PERA, DPSRS, and
Denver Public Schools (DPS) continue and the hope is that
legislation that would allow for a merger at a later date can be
drafted for the next legislative session in January.
Stating that PERA is “vastly underfunded”
and “on the path to insolvency” fails to take into account the
following facts:
-
PERA uses an actuarial methodology
that employs a “smoothed market value” for assets to
determine funded status (assets to liabilities). This
methodology is widely used for pension fund valuation
because it avoids asset “snapshots” during potentially
widely fluctuating short-term markets, recognizing that
pension funds are long-term investors. PERA’s “smoothed
market value” for 2003 recognizes three of the worst years
in market history (2000, 2001 and 2002).
-
Members of PERA retired in record
numbers in 2002 and 2003, and are on track to do so again
this year. When that happens, PERA must pay benefits sooner
than anticipated which increases the liability side of the
equation.
-
The cost that members paid to
purchase service credit and the employer contribution rates
were decreased through legislative negotiations in 2000 when
PERA was fully funded.
-
PERA’s funded level was below 60
percent in 1970, and there was not a perceived crisis in
PERA’s financial health. When PERA’s funded status topped
100 percent, the current State administration promoted a
plan that was adopted to make sure taxpayers, through
employer contribution reductions, shared in PERA’s success
with consistently favorable investment markets.

The editorial further
states that the PERA Board should “listen” to those who
want members to contribute more to stabilize the fund.
The fact is that benefits guaranteed to PERA members are
of a contractual nature, and that means that unless
benefits are increased, contribution rates for members
cannot be increased.
The truth is that the taxpayers
of Colorado have gotten a bargain in their state retirement
fund, PERA. Costs for managing the largest pension fund in
Colorado are consistent with other public pension fund averages,
and far less than the cost of most mutual funds.
The leadership and the Board of
Trustees of Colorado PERA have been upfront and forthright with
PERA members about PERA’s funded status. Information about
PERA’s financial condition was mailed to all members and benefit
recipients in the past week. (Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report Summary) PERA regularly communicates details about the
retirement plan to its members and the public.
The News editorial team clearly
demonstrates its lack of understanding of the determination of
the funded status of pension plans. Their analogy that PERA
will only be able to meet 88 percent of its mortgage payment is
false. PERA will be able to meet 100 percent of its mortgage
payment in the future – it’s just that the “loan” will never be
paid off under the current historically-low employer
contribution rates, record number of retirements, and an
actuarial methodology that takes into account the negative
market performance of three recent consecutive years.
PERA is a $30 billion pension
fund. It’s the largest pension plan in the state, public or
private, and pension policy is not something that can be
tinkered with without long-term impacts. The PERA Board has
taken appropriate steps to ensure the funded status of the plan,
through legislative and other means, and now the State of
Colorado will perform its legal obligation to increase employer
contribution rates to levels as they existed before the year
2000.
Board
Action on DPSRS Merger
At their meeting on Tuesday, June 29, the
PERA Board of Trustees determined that it was in the best
interest of the PERA membership to terminate the Merger
Agreement with DPSRS.
CitiStreet to Conduct 401(k) Plan Survey
CitiStreet, the service provider for Colorado PERA's 401(k)
Plan, will be conducting a survey to gauge
participant satisfaction with the 401(k) Plan.
Beginning in late June, you may be contacted
by TNS Intersearch, an independent research firm, hired to
collect and measure feedback regarding your satisfaction with
the services provided by CitiStreet. The phone interviews will be brief and
calls
will be directed to your home phone number, occurring in the
evening or on Saturday. CitiStreet values your feedback and encourages you
to respond to this confidential and important survey.
If you have any questions about the survey
or your 401(k) account, please contact CitiStreet by calling
1-800-759-7372 and selecting the 401(k) option.
Employer Contribution Increase and Expanded Defined Contribution
Bill
Passed
Senate Bill 257, a
bill concerning public employee retirement plans, was passed by
the Legislature on May 5. This bill is sponsored by Sen. Dave Owen (Greeley)
and Rep. Brad Young (Lamar) and contains provisions to increase
the employer contribution rate to Colorado PERA and to expand
the defined contribution plan option for state employees hired
on or after January 1, 2006.
The PERA Board of
Trustees and the Governor support this bill, which was the
product of meetings between PERA, representatives of the
Governor’s Office, and defined contribution plan providers.
The bill:
 |
Increases
employer contributions to PERA by 0.5 percent of salary each
year beginning January 1, 2006, to reach a total of 3.0
percent of salary in 2012 and thereafter. |
 |
Separates the
State and School Division into two divisions with distinct
trust funds. |
 |
Increases the
employer contribution rate in the School Division by an
additional 0.4 percent of salary beginning in 2013, to reflect this
Division’s higher cost. |
 |
Establishes a
choice of a defined contribution (DC) plan for new state
employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. State employees
(excluding Higher Education) hired after January 1, 2006,
would be able to select an expanded state defined
contribution plan, a new defined contribution plan offered
by PERA, or the existing PERA defined benefit plan. New
hires would have 60 days to decide which plan to join. The
default plan would be the PERA defined benefit plan. |
 |
Requires
employer contributions to be paid for a PERA retiree working
for a PERA-affiliated employer, beginning July 1, 2005. |
 |
Renames the
Municipal Division the Local Government Division. |
Together with SB
132, SB 257 is vital to maintaining the long-term actuarial
soundness of PERA. SB 132, sponsored by Sen. Arnold
(Westminster) and Rep. Young (Lamar), contains provisions to
reduce PERA’s costs related to members and benefit recipients;
SB 257 is designed to address PERA’s funded status from the
employer’s perspective.
SB 257 was
passed by both the House and Senate and has been sent to Gov.
Owens.
Election Ballots Mailed
Ballots for this
year's Board election were mailed this week. Active PERA members
will elect three Trustees to the PERA Board of Trustees. Terms
expire on June 30, 2004, for School Category Trustee Sandra
Mills (appointed to fill a vacant seat in 2003); School Category
Amy Nichols; and State Category Trustee Terry Campbell.
Upon receiving your
ballot, take a moment to read the enclosed biographies of the
candidates, and then select the candidates of your choice.
Ballots must be postmarked by May 31. Election results will be
announced in late June.
Governor Signs Senate Bill 132
Governor
Owens signed Senate Bill 04-132 into law on Friday, April 30.
This bill was sponsored by Senator Ken Arnold (Westminster) and
Representative Brad Young (Lamar).
Provisions
of SB 132 include:
 |
Suspending the MatchMaker program effective for payrolls
in which the last day of the payroll period is on or
after June 1, 2004. |
 |
Reducing the interest paid to member accounts from the
current rate tied to the actuarial assumed rate of the
fund (currently 6.8 percent) to an amount not greater
than 5 percent to be determined annually by the Board,
effective July 1, 2004. |
 |
Requiring employers to pay contributions to PERA within
five days after members are paid effective July 1, 2004. |
 |
Resuming the MatchMaker program when Division Trust
Funds reach 110 percent funding levels. |
 |
Changing service retirement eligibility for members
hired on or after July 1, 2005, to age 55 with 30 years
of service, or at any age with 35 years of service.
Reduced retirement benefits for these new hires will be
available at age 50 with 25 years of service. |
 |
Reducing the annual post-retirement benefit increase for
members hired on or after July 1, 2005, to 3 percent or
the actual change in the Consumer Price Index, whichever
is lower. |
 |
Allocating a larger portion of the employer contribution
to the PERA trust funds by reducing the amount
contributed to the Health Care Trust Fund from 1.1
percent of salary to 1.02 percent of salary. |
Colorado PERA's 401(k) Plan Surpasses $1 Billion in Assets
On April 9, 2004,
assets in Colorado PERA’s 401(k) Plan surpassed $1 billion.
On April 1, 2004,
Boulder County became the first county to affiliate with PERA.
County employees transferred funds from their former retirement
plan into PERA’s 401(k) Plan, pushing current Plan assets to
nearly $1,020,000,000.
The Voluntary
Investment Plan (which later became PERA’s 401(k) Plan) was
established in 1985 as a voluntary investment plan for members
who wish to supplement their PERA member contribution accounts.
PERA’s 401(k) Plan had more than 72,300 enrollees, Boulder
County brought an additional 1,745 enrollees.
“The amazing growth
in the 19-year-old PERA 401(k) Plan came about because the
voluntary plan has proven to be a very cost-effective vehicle
for members to grow their own savings,” said Colorado PERA’s
Executive Director Meredith Williams.
News
Release (PDF)
Boulder County Affiliates with
Colorado PERA
On April 1, 2004,
Boulder County became the first county government to affiliate
with Colorado PERA. The County’s 2,145 eligible permanent and
temporary employees will represent nearly a 17 percent increase
to the current 12,876 active members in the Municipal Division.
Colorado PERA’s State and School Division has 161,686 active
members and the Judicial Division has 274 active members.
As PERA members,
employees of Boulder County will participate in PERA’s defined
benefit retirement plan and have the option of joining PERA’s
401(k) Plan. The defined benefit plan provides guaranteed
lifetime benefits and in-service death and disability benefits
for those who qualify. PERA retirees receive annual benefit
increases and have access to health care insurance through PERA.
“In addition to the
financial benefits of PERA, our employees will enjoy one of the
best retiree health benefits packages you can find,” said
Boulder County Commission Chair Paul Danish. “As the budgetary
environment in Washington, D.C., continues to prevent adequate
funding of our Social Security system, PERA becomes increasingly
attractive.”
Last year, the
County initiated an employee opinion survey that indicated a
high degree of interest in looking at PERA as an alternative to
their current 401(k) plan. The County thoroughly reviewed PERA
benefits and had an independent actuarial study conducted that
determined PERA is currently financially sound. On December 18,
2003, the Boulder County Board of Commissioners passed a
resolution to affiliate with Colorado PERA.
“The Boulder County
Commissioners and staff should be congratulated for their
thorough and professional approach to the affiliation process,”
said Dennis Gatlin, PERA’s field education manager who works
with employers on affiliations. “County employees were very
enthusiastic about their opportunity to join Colorado PERA. I
believe that Boulder County will be very pleased by the service
and responsiveness of Colorado PERA for many years. I look
forward to continuing to work with Boulder County.”
Boulder County
provides a broad range of services to more than 280,500 citizens
and employs 2,145 people.
Colorado PERA Executive Director Named Chair of Council of
Institutional Investor Board
On March 25,
Meredith Williams, Colorado PERA’s executive director, was
elected chair of the Council of Institutional Investors, an
association of more than 140 public, corporate, and union
pension funds with assets in excess of $3 trillion.
The Council,
created by pension fund leaders in 1985, focuses on issues that
involve shareholder rights and is known as a leader and
innovator in the corporate governance arena. Issues in which the
Council has been involved include proxy voting reform, the
establishment of best practices for director/shareholder
communication, mutual fund disclosure of portfolio holdings and
fund expenses, stock option expensing, offshore reincorporation,
and other topics related to good corporate management.
Council members and
staff meet with federal elected officials and their staffs,
leaders in the business world, and the corporate governance
community to promote shareholder rights. The Council also
provides testimony at Congressional hearings, publishes articles
on corporate governance topics, and often speaks at professional
conferences as the leading authority on corporate governance
issues.
Williams’ election
to a leadership role in Council benefits Colorado PERA members
because they will have representation in an organization that
promotes practices that strengthen pension fund investments.
“These are exciting
times for those devoted to increasing shareholder value through
good corporate governance. I am honored to work with Council
members and staff as we seek to effectively convey our message
to Congress, regulators, the market, and corporate leaders,”
said Williams.
Williams joined
PERA as the executive director in March 2000. He started his
professional career as a junior accountant with the Kansas
Legislative Division of Post Audit, the audit arm of the Kansas
government. He served as Kansas’ Legislative Post Auditor from
1983 until his 1991 appointment as executive secretary of the
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System.
Williams is a
graduate of the University of Kansas with a degree in business
administration and economics. He received his law degree in 1975
from Washburn University School of Law, Topeka.
401(k)
Fee Structure
|
Fees charged
for administration of the 401(k) Plan are changing.
Although timed with the change to CitiStreet, the fee
increase would have occurred anyway. The new
administrative fee structure (as shown in the table at
right) spreads the fees proportionately based on the
number of accounts and the value of those accounts in
each account balance grouping.
Management
fees for each fund in the Plan are identified in the
"Management Fees" table (below right). Management fees are
removed by the individual fund managers from your
account activity and are reflected in your quarterly
returns. These fees have been previously reported to you
and have been posted on PERA’s Web site. Fees do change
over time, and the current fees are shown in the table.
The new fee
structure for Colorado PERA’s 401(k) Plan allows you to
know up front what it costs to participate in the Plan.
We believe in disclosing all fees, not just the
administrative fee deducted from your account each
month.
Remember
that it is often difficult to discern what fees are
being charged in different plans. Very often, it’s not
an “apples to apples” comparison. You need to determine
what management fee each fund is charging (usually
represented as basis points, or a percentage of the
total amount of money you have in that fund), in
addition to the monthly administrative fees charged by
the plan. These fees are assessed monthly, so you’ll
have to review the bottom line to determine your total
cost.
|
|
|
Administrative Fees Effective 4/1/04 |
|
Account Balance |
Monthly Fee |
Total Fee per Year |
|
$0-$25,000 |
$2.00 |
$24.00 |
|
$25,000.01-$50,000 |
$2.25 |
$27.00 |
|
$50,000.01-$75,000 |
$2.50 |
$30.00 |
|
$75,000.01-$100,000 |
$2.75 |
$33.00 |
|
$100,000.01-$125,000 |
$3.00 |
$36.00 |
|
$125,000.01 or greater |
$3.25 |
$39.00 |
|
|
|
Management Fees |
|
Fund |
Fund Management Fee |
|
Northern Trust Short Term Fund |
0.22% |
|
PIMCO Low Duration Fund |
0.43% |
|
PIMCO Total Return Fund |
0.43% |
|
Dodge & Cox Balanced Fund |
0.53% |
|
PERA 401(k) Growth & Income Fund |
0.60% |
|
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund |
0.05% |
|
Fidelity Contrafund |
1.00% |
|
Dodge & Cox Stock Fund |
0.54% |
|
GMO Growth Fund |
0.78% |
|
EuroPacific Growth Fund |
0.90% |
|
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund |
0.67% |
|
Fidelity Freedom 2000 Fund |
0.70% |
|
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund |
0.81% |
|
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund |
0.88% |
|
Fidelity Freedom 2030 Fund |
0.91% |
|
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund |
0.94% |
|
Board of Trustees
Approves
May
Board Election Slate
Colorado PERA’s
Board of Trustees approved a slate of eight candidates running for
seats in the May Board election. There are five candidates for
the two positions in the School Category and three candidates
for one position in the State Category.
School
Category Candidates
Susan Beeman, Pueblo School District
Jim Farrell, Douglas County Schools
Sandra Mills, Fort Morgan School District (incumbent)
Amy Nichols, Aurora Public Schools (incumbent)
David Williamson, Boulder Valley School District
State
Category Candidates
Tammy Long, Colorado State Patrol
Mike Serlet, Colorado Water Conservation Board
Brent Voge, Colorado Department of Revenue
PERA members of the
State and School Division will
be sent ballots and candidate biographies in early May to elect
representatives in the above categories. School Category members
(those employed by a School Category employer) will vote for two
candidates in the School Category. State Category members (those
employed by a State Category employer) will vote for one
candidate in the State Category.
Terms expire on
June 30, 2004, for School Category Trustee Sandra Mills
(appointed to fill a vacant seat in 2003); School Category
Trustee Amy Nichols; and State Category Trustee Terry Campbell.
Colorado PERA Recognized for Commitment to Accurate Financial
Reporting
The Colorado Public
Employees’ Retirement Association (Colorado PERA) has been
awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in
Financial Reporting by the Government Finance Officers
Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA). This is the
18th straight year PERA has won the award. The Certificate of
Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of
public employee retirement system accounting and financial
reporting.
Meredith Williams,
Colorado PERA’s executive director who accepted the award, said
“The Certificate of Achievement is an endorsement of PERA’s
mission to promote long-term financial security for our
membership. It reinforces the organization’s unwavering
commitment to accountability in all aspects.”
In order to win
this award, PERA’s 2002 comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR)
was judged by an impartial panel and found to meet the high
standards of the program including demonstrating a constructive
“spirit of full disclosure” to clearly communicate its financial
story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the
CAFR.
PERA also received
the GFOA Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Annual
Financial Reporting for its 2002 popular annual financial report
(PAFR). In order to receive this award, the content of the PAFR
had to meet program standards of creativity, presentation,
understandability, and reader appeal.
The GFOA is a
nonprofit professional association serving approximately 14,000
government finance professionals with offices in Chicago and
Washington, D.C.
News
Release (PDF)
Colorado PERA's Benefit Outflows
vs. Investment Income
In a Rocky
Mountain News article on January 30, 2004, State Treasurer
Mike Coffman stated that “PERA pays out more in benefits than it
takes in from contributions and investment income.”
The following table
outlines Colorado PERA’s benefit and investment flows since
1999, and it shows there
were no years in which PERA paid
more in benefits than was taken in from contributions and
investment income.
As disclosed in the
most recent Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (as of
December 31, 2002), PERA does have a $4 billion unfunded
liability, which was also stated by the Treasurer in this
article. Regarding disclosure of this unfunded liability, PERA’s
actuaries wrote the following in their actuarial valuation
report to the PERA Board of Trustees: “It is our opinion that
PERA continues to have a relatively good funded ratio of 88%
(based on the actuarial value of assets). However, the
contribution rates are not currently sufficient to support the
current benefit structures of the System. If there is not a
significant recovery in the investment markets in the near
future, the long term ability of the System to support the
benefits will be challenged in the absence of a significant
increase in the contribution rates.” – Gabriel, Roeder, Smith &
Co.
The PERA Board,
seeing the need to improve the stability of the fund, has proposed a
solution through a comprehensive
legislative package for 2004.
The proposed changes will equitably affect PERA constituent
groups and will stabilize funding for both the near and long
term if the legislative package is approved by the General
Assembly and signed by the Governor.
Net Benefit Outflows vs.
Investment Income
(Does not include the 401(k) Plan)
For Periods
Ending December 31
(In Thousands of Dollars)
|
|
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
Benefit Inflows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
Contributions |
$353,949 |
$374,062 |
$403,225 |
$434,499 |
$445,105 |
|
Employer
Contributions |
499,268 |
506,747 |
415,045 |
430,742 |
480,585 |
|
Subtotal |
853,217 |
880,809 |
818,270 |
865,241 |
925,690 |
|
Purchased Service |
73,526 |
101,433 |
127,383 |
362,109 |
771,961 |
|
Retiree Health Care Premiums |
25,611 |
28,751 |
43,960 |
48,825 |
55,470 |
|
Total Benefit Inflows |
952,354 |
1,010,993 |
989,613 |
1,276,175 |
1,753,121 |
|
Benefit Outflows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree Benefit Payments |
(989,536) |
(1,093,779) |
(1,228,730) |
(1,372,218) |
(1,545,268) |
|
Health Care Benefits |
(64,979) |
(77,332) |
(103,472) |
(118,470) |
(121,198) |
|
Refunds |
(100,577) |
(138,715) |
(101,825) |
(99,302) |
(107,271) |
|
Disability & Life Insurance
Premiums |
(8,784) |
(5,265) |
(3,527) |
(4,450) |
(5,103) |
|
Total Benefit Outflows |
(1,163,876) |
(1,315,091) |
(1,437,554) |
(1,594,440) |
(1,778,840) |
|
Net
Inflow/(Outflow)
from
Benefits |
(211,522) |
| |